The effect of various orthodontic treatments on facial attractiveness. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial and smile attractiveness are significant motivating factor for patients to seek orthodontic treatment. Although there is a general belief that orthodontic treatment improves facial appearance, this has yet not been systematically evaluated.</p> <p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To assess the current evidence on the effect of orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness.</p> <p><strong>Search Methods:</strong> Systematic and unrestricted search of nine databases were performed up to January 2022.</p> <p><strong>Selection Criteria: </strong>Studies evaluating facial attractiveness before and after orthodontic treatment.</p> <p><strong>Data Collection and Analysis: </strong>Extracted data included study design and setting, sample size and demographics, malocclusion type, treatment modality and method for outcome assessment. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies and with RoB-2 for randomized controlled trials. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies were included in data synthesis; three randomized controlled clinical trials and 17 non-randomized clinical studies of retrospective or prospective design. One of the randomized controlled trials was found to have low risk of bias, one presented some concerns and the third showed a high risk of bias. All non-randomized studies showed either unclear or high risk of bias. </p> <p>Data syntheses showed that orthodontic treatment improved facial attractiveness ratings by 9% when compared to untreated controls (MD: 9.05 / 95% CI: 4.71; 13.39). A combination of orthodontics and orthognathic surgery also showed a positive effect of 5.5% (MD: 5.51 / 95% CI: 1.55; 9.47) when compared to orthodontic treatment alone. There was no difference in effect between extraction and non-extraction treatments (MD: -0.89 / 95% CI: -8.72; 6.94) or between different types of Class II correctors (MD:2.21 / 95% CI: -16.51; 20.93).</p> <p><strong>Limitations: </strong>With the exception of 2 RCTs, included studies were of unclear or low quality.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Orthodontic treatment has a clinically weak effect on facial attractiveness when compared to no treatment. The same is true when a combined orthodontic/surgical treatment is compared to orthodontics alone.</p> <p><strong>Registration:</strong> PROSPERO #: CRD42020169904</p> <p><strong>Conflict of Interest: </strong>None</p> <p><strong>Funding:</strong> None</p>
ShareScore
8/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 0
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0