data sets from "Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60S–60N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model"
<p>Monthly means data sets from satellite, ground-based and model records used in the article entitled: "Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60 S–60 N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model".</p> <p>Information about and the most recent versions of each dataset can be found at their individual source locations:</p> <p>Merged satellite datasets</p> <ol> <li>SBUV MOD – https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/merged/index.html (NASA GSFC, USA)</li> <li>SBUV COH: https://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/SBUV_CDR/ (NOAA, USA).</li> <li>GOZCARDS: https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/esds/competitive-programs/measures/gozcards (JPL, NASA, USA)</li> <li>SWOOSH: https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl8/swoosh/ (NOAA, USA).</li> <li>SAGE-CCI-OMPS and MEGRIDOP datasets are available through https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/ozone/data/ and ftp://cci_web@ftp-ae.oma.be/esacci (ESA Climate Office). They are provided by FMI, Finland</li> <li>SAGE-SCIAMACHY-OMPS: data record is available upon registration via the following link: http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/DataRequest/ (U. Bremen, Germany).</li> <li>SAGE-OSIRIS-OMPS: downloading instructions can be found at https://research-groups.usask.ca/osiris/data-products.php#OSIRISLevel3andMergedDataProducts (U. Saskatchewan, Canada).</li> </ol> <p>Ground-based records:</p> <ol> <li>Umkehr – https://gml.noaa.gov/aftp/data/ozwv/Dobson/AC4/Umkehr/Monthly/ (NOAA, USA)</li> <li>ozonesondes – https://hegiftom.meteo.be/datasets/ozonesondes (HEGIFTOM). Measurements at the various stations are provided by the following institutions: <ul> <li>Hohenpeissenberg: DWD, Germany</li> <li>Payerne:MeteoSwiss, Switzerland</li> <li>OHP, CNRS, France</li> <li>Hilo, NOAA, USA</li> <li>Lauder, NIWA, New Zealand</li> </ul> </li> <li>lidar: <a href="http://www.ndacc.org/">http://www.ndacc.org/</a> . Measurement at the various stations are provided by the following institutions: <ul> <li>Hohenpeissenberg: DWD, Germany</li> <li>OHP: CNRS, France</li> <li>MLO: JPL, NASA, USA</li> <li>Lauder: NIWA, New Zealand</li> </ul> </li> <li>FTIR spectrometers – <a href="http://www.ndacc.org/">http://www.ndacc.org/</a> Three sites only provided quality checked measurements relevant for the article. For other ozone FTIR measurements, data in <a href="http://www.ndacc.org/">http://www.ndacc.org/</a> must be used. Measurement used in the article are provided by the following institutions: <ul> <li>Zugspitze: KIT, Germany</li> <li>Jungfraujoch: ULiège, GIRPAS team, Belgium</li> <li>Lauder: NIWA, New Zealand</li> </ul> </li> <li>Microwave spectrometers: <a href="http://www.ndacc.org/">http://www.ndacc.org/</a> Measurement at the various stations are provided by the following institutions: <ul> <li>Payerne: MeteoSwiss, Switzerland</li> <li>Mauna Loa: NRL, USA</li> <li>Lauder: NRL, USA</li> </ul> </li> </ol> <p>Chemistry Climate Model (CCM) CCMI simulations are avilable at https://blogs.reading.ac.uk/ccmi</p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0