OPENING SESSION: Shifting paradigms: Turning non-conventional to non-negotiable
<p><em>What are the global systems of industry, manufacture and education which label bamboo and adobe as ’non-conventional’ and concrete and steel as ‘conventional?</em> Are these systems designed for equity and social & environmental justice, or are they perpetuating systems of power which were established in colonial times? Are we encouraging the next generation of decision makers to think about choices of materials and technologies outside of the technical realm, so that they may be a part of the paradigm shift required for transformational change to occur? </p> <p>Search for a definition of non-conventional materials and technologies (NOCMAT), and you are more likely to find 'bamboo and adobe’ than 'concrete and steel’. But if over 90% of global dwellings fall into the NOCMAT category, then why are these materials still considered non-conventional? As we search for low-carbon alternatives for the built environment, NOCMAT is a most promising solution. Perhaps it is time we shift the paradigm and drop the 'non-conventional' label in favour of 'non-negotiable’; our lives on this planet could depend on it. </p> <p>These are the big issues which were explored by NOCMAT’s expert panel during the opening plenary session on 7 June 2022.</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0