Supplementary materials of the paper entitled: "Metamorphic Testing Meets Regression Testing: A Case Study of Scientific Software Maintenance"
<p>Supplementary materials of the paper entitled:</p> <p>“Metamorphic Testing Meets Regression Testing: A Case Study of Scientific Software Maintenance”</p> <p>file01 - source code for detecting and comparing output relations of a given metamorphic relation<br> file02 - interview transcripts and qualitative coding results<br> file03 - system script for compiling SWMM, creating sSWMM simulation outputs, and logging execution time<br> file04 - source code for SWMM 5.1.014<br> file05 - source code for SWMM 5.1.015<br> file06 - a suite of 40 regression tests (40 .inp files)<br> file07 - result table for 760 cases (19 MRs × 40 .inp files)<br> file08 - 491 automatically generated follow-up .inp files via reuse<br> file09 - result table for mutation analysis<br> file10 - output files for mutation analysis with metamorphic testing:<br> a. Original source output<br> b. Original follow-up output<br> c. Mutant source output<br> d. Mutant follow-up output</p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0