zenodoopen
Supplementary material 2 from: de Lima AG, de Paula-Souza J, Ringelberg JJ, Simon MF, de Queiroz LP, Borges LM, de Freitas Mansano V, Souza VC, Scalon VR (2022) New segregates from the Neotropical genus Stryphnodendron (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). In: Hughes CE, de Queiroz LP, Lewis GP (Eds) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae Part 1: New generic delimitations. PhytoKeys 205: 203-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.82220
Table S1
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 0
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4
Topics
Non-monophyly is a prominent issue in mimosoid legumeseven in some of the less speciose genera such as the neotropical genus Stryphnodendron. This genus includes 35 species occurring from Nicaragua to Southern Brazil mostly in humid forests and savannas. Previous taxonomic studies of Stryphnodendron have highlighted morphologically distinct groups within the genusrecognized by differences on leaves (number of pinnae and size of leaflets)inflorescences (a simple or compound thyrse)and fruit types (legumenucoid legume or follicle). Recent phylogenetic analyses have confirmed the non-monophyly of Stryphnodendronsupporting the recognition of three independent and morphologically well-delimited genera. Here we re-circumscribe Stryphnodendron and propose the two new genera Gwilymia and Naiadendron. In additionwe also provide an updated taxonomic account of the closely related genus Microlobiusincluding the proposal of a lectotype for the single species in the genus. GwilymiaLeguminosaeMicrolobiusNaiadendronParapiptadeniaPhylogenyPiptadenia groupPityrocarpaPseudopiptadenia