Quasi-Armored Mud Clasts as Indicators of Transport Processes of Subaqueous Sediment Gravity-Flow

<p>Fig. S1&nbsp; Quasi-armored mud clasts in different case studying. (A) Quasi-armored mud clasts in the H1 division of Hybrid event bed, Eocene Liushagang Formation; (B) Quasi-armored mud clasts in massive sandstone, Early Cretaceous Lingshandao Formation; (C) Quasi-armored mud clasts in massive sandstone, Early Cretaceous, North Falkland Basin (Dodd et al., 2018); (D) Quasi-armored mud clasts in the upper part of massive sandstone, Middle Eocene, Ainsa System (Pickering et al., 2015); (E) and (F) Quasi-armored mud clasts in massive sandstone, Upper Jurassic, North Sea rift system (Jackson et al., 2011); (G) Quasi-armored mud clasts in the H3 division, Late Jurassic, in the northern North Sea (Haughton et al., 2003) ; (H) and (I) Quasi-armored mud clasts in massive sandstone, Late Jurassic, in the northern North Sea (Williams, 2015).</p> <p>Fig. S2 (A) Location of Beibuwan Basin in China. (B) Location of Weixi&rsquo;nan depression in the Beibuwan Basin. (C) Sedimentary facies distribution of the upper member of the Liushagang Formation in the Weixi&rsquo;nan depression. (D) Sedimentary sequence and stratigraphic framework of the Weixinan Depression, Beibuwan Basin (Huang et al., 2013).</p> <p>Fig. S3 The lateral distribution of gravity-flow deposits in the Upper of the Liushagang Formation in the research area from proximal to distal. For the location of the section, see Fig. S2 C.</p> <p>Fig. S4 Facies analysis of Well WZ11-7-1 (in relatively distal), dominated by hybrid event beds with common quasi-armored mud clasts in different units.</p> <p>Fig. S5 Facies analysis of Well WZ11-7-4 (in relatively proximal), dominated by high-density turbidities beds with occasional quasi-armored mud clasts. For the legend of facies analysis, see Fig. S4.</p>