zenodoopen
Figure 3 from: Hartgerink C, Wicherts J, van Assen M (2016) The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8860. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8860
Figure 3 - Data table from Ruys and Stapel (2008), retracted due to data fabrication. This table includes 15 duplicates (highlighted) in 32 cells, which can be seen as a serious data anomaly that could have been detected with, for example, automated screening procedures.
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0