Promoting conservation agriculture through push-pull technology as an agroecological transition.
<p>Abstract <br>Low soil fertility, weeds, pests, and climatic change severely threaten crop productivity and agricultural <br>sustainability, especially in SSA. Despite decades of research finding adequate technical solutions for most <br>situations of food systems, the problem of low food productivity has persisted. In an effort to counter this, <br>intensive agricultural systems have been mooted including the high application of agrochemicals to control <br>weeds, and pests and increase production. However, these initiatives have not lasted beyond the project cycle <br>and they have instigated land degradation through unsustainable practices. As a solution, conservation <br>agricultural practices have been promoted among small-scale farmers. These practices focus on minimizing soil <br>disturbance, crop diversification, and cover cropping. Push-pull technology is an aspect of conservation <br>agriculture where intercropping a cereal crop with a repellent plant, such as desmodium and planting an <br>attractive trap plant, such as brachiaria or Napier grass as a border crop around this intercrop. This paper aimed <br>at reviewing existing literature to establish the linkage between conservation agriculture components, push-pull <br>technology, and a sustainable agroecological transition. A list of questions directed the discussion where push<br>pull technology has been proven to be an aspect that promotes conservation agriculture. It has been able to <br>increase crop yields, reduced tillage, established a cover crop on the farm, and further, PPT has a regenerative <br>aspect through the integration of livestock husbandry providing organic manure that and together with the <br>nitrogen fixation ability of the grass, improve soil fertility, conserved soil moisture, and reduce erosion. This <br>reduces the use of inorganic input, and machinery making farming economical for small-holder farmers. </p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0