An innovative method of three-dimensional bone reconstruction of the anterior mandible with preserved dentition using an allogeneic bone block- 6-month follow-up- supplementary materials
<p>Table S1. The Shapiro-Wilk’s normality test (N=32 for each variable and each tooth) for the differences between before and after the treatment. W – test values, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S2. Descriptive statistics of the studied bone growth parameters.</p> <p>Table S3 . Relative Treatment Effects for the studied teeth and the statistical significance of the differences between before and after treatment.</p> <p>Table S4. Spearman’s correlations of the bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth). N – sample size, R – correlation coefficient, t(N-2) – test value, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S5. The differences in bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth) between sexes. N – sample size, U – test value, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S6. The differences in bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth) between patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with a passive wire (Wire) and patients without ongoing treatment (Without wire). N – sample size, U – test value, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S7. The differences in bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth) between patients with recessions (Yes) and patients without recession (No). N – sample size, U – test value, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S8. The differences in bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth) between patients with thin biotype (Thin) and patients with thick biotype (Thick). N – sample size, U – test value, p – statistical significance.</p> <p>Table S9. The differences in bone growth parameters (averaged data for all teeth) between patients with excessive mentalis muscle tension (Yes) and patients without such the feature (No). N – sample size, U – test value, p – statistical significance.</p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4