zenodoopen

Model data for probabilistic projections of the Amery Ice Shelf catchment, Antarctica, under high ice-shelf basal melt conditions

Model data for probabilistic projections of the Amery Ice Shelf catchment,  Antarctica, under high ice-shelf basal melt conditions ====================================================================== This archive contains ice-sheet model output and statistical models  used in the manuscript: "Probabilistic projections of the Amery Ice Shelf catchment, Antarctica, under high ice-shelf basal melt conditions" by: Sanket Jantre, Matthew Hoffman, Nathan M. Urban, Trevor Hillebrand, Mauro Perego, Stephen Price, John D. Jakeman OVERVIEW -------- Statistical models and corresponding datasets are archived in the file Amery_UQ_Study_Statistical_Models.zip.  That file contains a README that describes its contents. Contact for statistical models: Sanket Jantre, Brookhaven National Laboratory, sjantre@bnl.gov The remaining files in this archive contain output from ice-sheet model  simulations using the MPAS-Albany Land Ice (MALI) model  (Hoffman et al. 2018, https://github.com/MALI-Dev/E3SM) applied to a regional domain of the Amery Ice Shelf catchment of Antarctica with mesh resolution varying from 4 to 20 km. The contents of these files are described below. Contact for MALI simulations: Matthew Hoffman, Los Alamos National Laboratory, mhoffman@lanl.gov ENSEMBLES --------- The ensembles consist of all or a subset of 200 model runs with values for 6 parameters sampled from a Sobol' sequence over a specified range. Parameters and Sampled Ranges: 1. Ice stiffness scaling factor, Cφ: (0.8, 1.2) 2. Basal friction scaling factor, Cμ: (0.8, 1.2) 3. Basal slip exponent, q: (0.1, 0.333) 4. Calving yield stress, σmax: (80, 180) kPa 5. Ice-shelf melt coefficient, γ0: (9620, 471000) m yr−1 6. Ice-shelf basal melt rate, m: (12, 58) Gt yr−1 SCENARIOS --------- The archive contains output from 4 scenarios described in the manuscript: Historical relaxation (RELX): For each ensemble member, we conducted a 50 year relaxation from the initial condition using historical climate forcing to integrate out fast transient behavior. For surface mass balance, we applied a 1995–2017 climatological average from RACMO2.3p1 (Van Wessem et al., 2014; van den Broeke, 2019). The ocean thermal forcing was the observation-based climatology compiled for ISMIP6-Antarctica, which uses data from 1995–2018 (Jourdain et al., 2020; Nowicki et al., 2020). The 50 year relaxation duration was chosen as the most rapid adjustments occur in the first few decades of integration, while the long term adjustment to a fully steady state takes thousands of years. Relaxation to full steady state would require substantially more computing resources than our entire set of ensembles and also leads to the complication of different runs having potentially very different initial states. Future improvements to model initialization that account for surface elevation change (Perego et al., 2014) may reduce model drift and adjust this requirement. The final model state in each run at the end of RELX was given the nominal date of January 1, 2015, and all three projection ensembles were branched from these states. Control projection (CTRL): The CTRL projection ensemble were an extension of the RELX configurations, continuing the same surface mass balance and ocean thermal forcing from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2300. This ensemble was used to assess model drift relative to the forced response of the climate scenarios.  SSP1-2.6 projection (SSP1): Our SSP1 projection used annual surface mass balance and ocean thermal forcing derived from a UKESM SSP1-2.6 climate scenario (expAE10 from Seroussi et al., 2024). Surface mass balance and ocean thermal forcing were applied as anomalies relative to the climatological mean forcings in RELX/CTRL to avoid issues related to climate model bias and abrupt changes in forcing. This ensemble was also run from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2300. SSP5-8.5 projection (SSP5) Our SSP5 projection used the UKESM SSP5-8.5 projection forcings (expAE05 from Seroussi et al., 2024), again applied as anomalies and from 2015 to 2300. OUTPUT ------ Each ensemble directory contains at the base level: * branch_ensemble.cfg - configuration file for the ensemble_generator test   case (https://mpas-dev.github.io/compass/latest/users_guide/landice/test_groups/ensemble_generator.html)    of COMPASS (Configuration Of Model for Prediction Across Scales Setups, https://github.com/MPAS-Dev/compass)   used to set up the ensemble. * mesh_vars.nc - netCDF file containing the mesh variables.  This file is the   same for all ensembles.  These fields need to be appended to an output file to   visualize in, e.g., Paraview.  This can be done with the command:   ncks -A mesh_vars.nc output.nc Each ensemble contains subdirectories for each run numbered 000-199.  Each run directory contains the files: * globalStats.nc - scalar metrics at every time step * output.nc - spatial fields at 10 year intervals * run_info.cfg - summary of parameter values Notes: * The SSP1 and SSP5 ensembles contain a subset of the full 200 runs   because some runs were filtered out as being unnecessary during model   calibration (see manuscript). * The RELX ensemble is run for 50 years with an arbitrary start year of 2000.   The CTRL, SSP1, and SSP5 ensembles are started in 2015 from the final state   of the corresponding RELX run (nominally 2050).  Because spatial data has   been saved in this archive at 10 year intervals, the first output for the   three projection ensembles is 2020.  To get the initial condition for the   projection ensembles, use the 2050 state from RELX for the corresponding   model run. * Spatial field output at 1 year intervals, as well as run input, log, and   restart files are available from the corresponding contact.  The complete   run data is about 2 TB. CITATION -------- If you find these data useful, please cite the DOI for this  archive (10.5281/zenodo.11166628), as well as our manuscript submitted to The Cryosphere. This archive is approved by Los Alamos National Laboratory for public release under LA-UR-24-24969; distribution is unlimited.   REFERENCES ---------- Hoffman, M. J., Perego, M., Price, S. F., Lipscomb, W. H., Zhang, T., Jacobsen, D., Tezaur, I., Salinger, A. G., Tuminaro, R., and Bertagna, L.: MPAS-Albany Land Ice (MALI): a variable-resolution ice sheet model for Earth system modeling using Voronoi grids, Geoscientific Model Development, 11, 3747–3780, 2018. Jourdain, N. C., Asay-Davis, X., Hattermann, T., Straneo, F., Seroussi, H., Little, C. M., and Nowicki, S.: A protocol for calculating basal melt rates in the ISMIP6 Antarctic ice sheet projections, The Cryosphere, 14, 3111–3134, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3111-2020, 2020. Nowicki, S., Goelzer, H., Seroussi, H., Payne, A. J., Lipscomb, W. H., Abe-Ouchi, A., Agosta, C., Alexander, P., Asay-Davis, X. S., Barthel, A., Bracegirdle, T. J., Cullather, R., Felikson, D., Fettweis, X., Gregory, J. M., Hattermann, T., Jourdain, N. C., Kuipers Munneke, P., Larour, E., Little, C. M., Morlighem, M., Nias, I., Shepherd, A., Simon, E., Slater, D., Smith, R. S., Straneo, F., Trusel, L. D., van den Broeke, M. R., and van de Wal, R.: Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models, The Cryosphere, 14, 2331–2368, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2331-2020, 2020. Perego, M., Price, S., and Stadler, G.: Optimal Initial Conditions for Coupling Ice Sheet Models to Earth System Models, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119, 1894–1917, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003181, 2014. Seroussi, H., et al. 2024. ISMIP6 Projections 2300 Antarctica Protocol. https://theghub.org/groups/ismip6/wiki/ISMIP6-Projections2300-Antarctica.  van den Broeke, M.: RACMO2.3p1 annual surface mass balance Antarctica (1979-2014), PANGAEA - Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.896940, 2019. van Wessem, J., Reijmer, C., Morlighem, M., Mouginot, J., Rignot, E., Medley, B., Joughin, I., Wouters, B., Depoorter, M., Bamber, J., Lenaerts, J., Van De Berg, W., Van Den Broeke, M., and Van Meijgaard, E.: Improved Representation of East Antarctic Surface Mass Balance in a Regional Atmospheric Climate Model, Journal of Glaciology, 60, 761–770, https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J051, 2014.

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship: 8
Harmonization: 4
Access: 16
Reuse readiness: 8
Engagement: 0

Topics

ice sheet modeling glaciology Antarctica Amery Ice Shelf Cryosphere