Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Fig. 3 in Post-collection taphonomy, sampling effects and the role of the collector in palaeontological collections: A case study from an early Late Triassic bone accumulation in southernmost Brazil

Fig. 3. Results of the sampling by three institutions (A–C) schematized into the Voorhies Groups (Voorhies 1969, sensu Behrensmeyer 1975; modified), favouring biases in data interpretations and palaeoecological reconstructions. Abbreviations: ifr, indeterminate fragments; ith, isolated teeth; ND, not determinable; VG, Voorhies Groups.

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics