zenodoopen
Fig. 3 in Post-collection taphonomy, sampling effects and the role of the collector in palaeontological collections: A case study from an early Late Triassic bone accumulation in southernmost Brazil
Fig. 3. Results of the sampling by three institutions (A–C) schematized into the Voorhies Groups (Voorhies 1969, sensu Behrensmeyer 1975; modified), favouring biases in data interpretations and palaeoecological reconstructions. Abbreviations: ifr, indeterminate fragments; ith, isolated teeth; ND, not determinable; VG, Voorhies Groups.
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0