Supplementary materials to the article "Practices and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies"

<p><strong>Abstract of the paper:</strong></p> <p>This article presents the results of three studies on practices in and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies. The first study reports on a survey in which 52 researchers in translation and interpreting with experience in empirical research answered questions about their practices in and attitudes toward replication. The survey data were complemented by a bibliometric study of publications indexed in the Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation (BITRA) (Franco Aixel&aacute; 2001&ndash;2019) that explicitly stated in the title or abstract that they were derived from a replication. In a second bibliometric study, a conceptual replication of Yeung&rsquo;s (2017) study on the acceptance of replications in neuroscience journals was conducted by analyzing 131 translation and interpreting journals. The article aims to provide evidence-based arguments for initiating a debate about the need for replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies and its implications for the development of the discipline.</p> <p><strong>Description of the supplementary materials:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Material 1: questionnaire in English</li> <li>Material 2: questionnaire in Spanish</li> <li>Material 3: results of both questionnaires</li> <li>Material 4: corpus of identified replications in Translation and Interpreting Studies (TIS)</li> <li>Material 5: acceptance of replications in TIS journals</li> </ul>