FIGURE 1 in Trilobite moulting behaviour variability had little association with body proportions

FIGURE 1. Trilobite generalised moult configurations featuring in the dataset presented here. A: Olenus truncatus Brünnich, 1781, PMU unnumbered specimen, cephalic sutures configuration group, B: Ellipsocephalus sp. Zenker, 1833, PMU 28642, Salter's configuration, C: Trimerocephalus mastophthalmus Richter, 1856, NHMUK I.5100, Salter's configuration, D: Dalmanitina socialis (Barrande, 1846), NHMUK 42341, Zombie configuration, E: Paradoxides gracilis Boeck, 1827, NHMUK 42440, Henningsmoen's configuration, F: Estaingia bilobata Pocock, 1964, SAM-P 46956, Henningsmoen's configuration, G: Estaingia bilobata, SAM-P 43767, cephalic sutures configuration group, H: Redlichia takooensis Lu, 1950, SAM-P 43593, Salter's configuration, I: Accadoparadoxides pinus Westergård, 1936, PMU 25995, cephalic sutures + inversion configuration group, J: Phillipsia sp. Portlock, 1843, NHMUK I.1092, cephalic sutures + inversion configuration group. Scale bars equal 5 mm for A, B, F, G, J; 10 mm for C–E, H, I.