Evaluation of literature reviews & primary sources thereof regarding the continuous development of AI
<p>Replication Package for the Paper The Past, Present, and Future of Research on the Continuous Development of AI.</p> <p>The Replication package includes:</p> <ul> <li>evaluation_literatureStudy.html/ipynb: <ul> <li>Analysis to answer RQ1: Analysis regarding the literature reviews and their demographic information and empirical standards</li> <li>Analysis to answer RQ2: main topics covered by systematic literature reviews and calculation of trends over time</li> <li>Analysis to answer RQ3: BerTopic Analysis for clustering primary sources</li> </ul> </li> <li>input.zip: Input Datasets for analysis</li> <li>generatedOutput: Output generated by analysis in evaluation_literatureStudy.ipynb - for further information of each csv or pdf file please refer to the analysis itself</li> <li>methodology.zp: <ul> <li>SLRFORSLR-data-includedSources - Excluded Sources.csv: Papers which were excluded because they did not fulfill inclusion/exclusion criteria</li> <li>SLRFORSLR-data-includedSources - Search terms.csv: database specific search terms and amount of results from each search term</li> <li>ThreatsToValidity-DeviationOfPrimarySources.pdf: As discussed in the threats to validity the identified literature studies where the primary sources differ to the stated amount by the literature reviews' authors.</li> <li>BerTopic_Models.zip: trained BerTopic models used to cluster primary sources</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0