Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Supplementary Material to "Evaluation of Active Occlusion Effect Cancellation in Earphones by Subjective, Real-Ear and Coupler Measurements"

<p>Supplementary figures for the Publication</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>F. Denk, L. J&uuml;rgensen, H. Husstedt (2024) <a href="https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2022.0124." target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Evaluation of Active Occlusion Effect Cancellation in Earphones by Subjective, Real-Ear and Coupler Measurements</strong></a>, <em>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</em> 72(3), pp. 145-160</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This supplementary material contains 3 types of figures:</p> <ul> <li>Overview_REMall_Levels_T: Overview of 1/6 octave long-term average levels of Real-Ear Measured (REM) sound pressure levels at eardrum for each subject (panel columns), Device (panel rows, rows 1-4 correspond to devices A-D, respectively) and condition (see line color). For better readability, two separate figures 1 and 2 are given for subjects 1-6 and 7-12.</li> <li>Overview_REMall_R: As Overview_REMall_Levels_T, but showing the Occlusion Effect OE, i.e., the difference to the Open-Ear condition.</li> <li>REM_Retest: Test and Retest results for three subjects (individual panels) for which the experiment was repeated. The results for the individual devices are given in separate figures.</li> </ul>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4