Fig. 3 in Pseudosesarma crassimanum
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of selected spinicaudatan taxa based on COI, 16S rRNA, EF1α and 28S rRNA inferred with MrBayes using taxonspecific matrices. A) Eocyzicidae fam. nov. and Leptestheriidae using Matrix 5 rooted based in the split between Eocyzicidae and Leptestehriidae and B) Cyzicidae s.s. using Matrix 3 rooted by the deepest split recovered in the analyses of all Spinicaudata. All individuals of the selected taxa and all codon positions were included. Genus affiliations are indicated. For Eocyzicus fam. nov. and Cyzicidae s.s. head shapes (rostrum shape and condyle length) corresponding to the four traditional cyzicid genera (Cyzicus, Caenestheria, Caenestheriella and Eocyzicus) are mapped based on the observed morphology of studied specimens. Rostrum shapes were differentiated into triangular and spatulated, irrespective of the presence of an additional posterior margin in the latter. Published information on the respective species was not considered to avoid errors for example due to cryptic species or wrong identifications. In some species, including E. taiwanensis, changes in rostrum morphology during growth has been observed (e.g., Rogers et al. 2017). Dotted lines indicate groups of specimen with same head shapes. Posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values are provided for each branch. Branches are color-coded according the geographic origin of the specimens. # = node in topology with highest likelihood, but bootstrap support <50%, - = node not recovered in most topology with highest likelihood.
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0