zenodoopen
Fig. 17a-f in Taxonomic re-evaluation of Andrena cyanomicans PÉREZ, 1895, A. fratella WARNCKE, 1968, A. maderensis WARNCKE, 1969, A. mirna WARNCKE, 1969, A. notata WARNCKE, 1968, and A. portosanctana WARNCKE, 1969 (Hymenoptera, Anthophila)
Fig. 17a-f: Structure of the propodeum: (a) Andrena notata, female: roughly rugose without dorsoventral laminae (Photo: ZOBODAT, 2021/25/03); (b) A. notata, male: pattern similar to female (Photo: ZOBODAT, 2021/25/03); (c) A. mirna, male: roughly rugose without dorsoventral laminae (Photo: ZOBODAT, 2021/25/03); (d) A. fratella female: roughly rugose with dorsoventral laminae, red arrows (Photo: ZOBODAT, 2021/25/03); (e) A. cyanomicans female: roughly rugose with dorsoventral laminae, red arrow (Photo: ZOBODAT, 2021/25/03); (f) A. maderensis male: rugose only in the centre (Photo: A. Kratochwil).
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0