Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Data and materials for Wallace et al (2018) Self-report versus electronic medical record recorded healthcare utilisation in older community-dwelling adults: comparison of two prospective cohort studies v1.2

<p>This comprises the data and materials for the study:&nbsp;Wallace&nbsp;E, Moriarty&nbsp;F, McGarrigle&nbsp;C, Smith&nbsp;SM, Kenny&nbsp;RA, Fahey T. (2018)&nbsp;Self-report versus electronic medical record recorded healthcare utilisation in older community-dwelling adults: Comparison of two prospective cohort studies. PLOS ONE 13(10): e0206201.&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206201">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206201</a></p> <p>The anonymised TILDA&nbsp;dataset is publicly available to researchers who meet the criteria for access, at no monetary cost, from the Irish Social Science&nbsp;Data&nbsp;Archive (ISSDA) at University College Dublin (<a href="https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ucd.ie%2Fissda%2Fdata%2Ftilda%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccc2345c4f5c543bbcddc08d5fd28200c%7C607041e7a8124670bd3030f9db210f06%7C0%7C0%7C636693271128219875&amp;sdata=%2Fcochi1RuRtYSUa5sF9uA%2BjOOoNYIg7DPpk0mZl5D2s%3D&amp;reserved=0">http://www.ucd.ie/issda/data/tilda/</a>) and the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan (<a href="https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.icpsr.umich.edu%2Ficpsrweb%2FICPSR%2Fstudies%2F34315&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccc2345c4f5c543bbcddc08d5fd28200c%7C607041e7a8124670bd3030f9db210f06%7C0%7C0%7C636693271128219875&amp;sdata=7LHSSqU8xotACMsalpAjVrV5m95DlapgQViyr4P%2FsXY%3D&amp;reserved=0">http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/34315</a>). For the CPCR cohort, no provision for&nbsp;data&nbsp;sharing was included in the original ethical approval and participant consent form. As a minimal&nbsp;data&nbsp;set necessary to replicate the present study could not be deidentified due to the large number of demographic variables considered, a synthetic version of the study&nbsp;dataset was produced using the synthpop package in R:&nbsp;<a href="https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcran.r-project.org%2Fweb%2Fpackages%2Fsynthpop%2Findex.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccc2345c4f5c543bbcddc08d5fd28200c%7C607041e7a8124670bd3030f9db210f06%7C0%7C0%7C636693271128229884&amp;sdata=j3If%2FNe%2F1eGsGAt9hyg3ICMqmLec4aOrjRVKppaRSFU%3D&amp;reserved=0">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/synthpop/index.html</a>. This&nbsp;dataset and the analytical code for the present study are presented here. Code&nbsp;developed on the synthetic data&nbsp;can be sent to frankmoriarty@rcsi.ie or&nbsp;<a href="mailto:enquiries.cpcr@rcsi.ie">enquiries.cpcr@rcsi.ie</a>&nbsp;to be run on the original&nbsp;data.</p> <p>v1.2 includes a more detailed description of how the dataset was synthesised.</p>

ShareScore

44/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
8

Topics

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.