Market Research - What's become... of new entrants in research workflows and scholarly communication? ('long list')
<p>Market Research - What’s become... of new entrants in research workflows and scholarly communication?</p> <p>Full report to be published as preprint on OSF Preprints shortly.</p> <p>To systematically create a list of the new entrants in research workflows and scholarly communication that I’ve seen over the years, I used a range of resources, listed hereunder:</p> <ul> <li>400+ Tools and innovations in scholarly communication (charting the <a href="http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list">creation and availability</a> (supply side))<a href="#_edn1">[i]</a>. This database continues to build on the 2015-2016 survey by Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman (both at Utrecht University Library), who are interested in the way information is created, shared, and processed in academia<a href="#_edn2">[ii]</a>. From this source I pulled 683 players. From the answers to the open and closed questions in the 2015-2016 survey I found 225 players.</li> <li>Presenters at STM events<a href="#_edn3">[iii]</a> from 2010-2017. This contributed 53 players.</li> <li>Outsell<a href="#_edn4">[iv]</a> ‘Companies to watch’, as per their annual Information Industry Outlook (2009-2017). This source provided 29 players.</li> <li>Pitches at APE (Academic Publishing in Europe) Conferences<a href="#_edn5">[v]</a> between 2011-2017. Here I found 44 players.</li> <li>Nominees for the ALPSP Award for Innovation in Publishing. This source contributed 10 players from 2014-2017.<a href="#_edn6">[vi]</a>.</li> </ul> <p>This file contains the 'long list' per 31 December 2018.</p> <p><a href="#_ednref1">[i]</a> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KUMSeq_Pzp4KveZ7pb5rddcssk1XBTiLHniD0d3nDqo/edit#gid=0</p> <p><a href="#_ednref2">[ii]</a> https://101innovations.wordpress.com/</p> <p><a href="#_ednref3">[iii]</a> https://www.stm-assoc.org/events/?previous</p> <p><a href="#_ednref4">[iv]</a> https://www.outsellinc.com/</p> <p><a href="#_ednref5">[v]</a> https://www.ape2019.eu/ape-literature</p> <p><a href="#_ednref6">[vi]</a> https://www.alpsp.org/Awards</p>
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4