Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Seismic interpretation of key stratigraphic and structural surfaces, and crustal faults within the Galicia 3-D reflection survey

<p>This repository contains all the seismic interpretations utilized for the analysis in the article &quot;<em>Origin of serpentinization patterns beneath the S-reflector detachment fault in the Galicia margin, offshore Spain</em>&quot;.&nbsp;</p> <p>The &quot;<em>Surfaces</em>&quot; file contains the CPS-3 shape files&nbsp;of the major stratigraphic and structural surfaces (seafloor, base of post-rift sedimentary strata, base of pre/syn-rift sedimentary strata, base of crystalline basement, S-reflector detachment fault, Moho). The &quot;<em>Faults</em>&quot; file contains the interpretations of the major crustal faults overlying the S-reflector detachment. The &quot;<em>Data</em>&quot; file contains the spatial boundary of where the S-reflector is the crust-mantle boundary, the P-wave velocities of Schuba et al. (2019) and calculated degree of serpentinization (Schuba et al., submitted) based on Christensen&#39;s (2004) 200 MPa/200<sup>o</sup>C serpentinite compilation&nbsp;study.&nbsp;</p> <p>All seismic interpretations were carried out on Petrel<sup>TM</sup> versions 2015 and 2017. The seismic reflection volume that was interpreted&nbsp;can be found&nbsp;at&nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/500151.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>References:&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li>Christensen, N.I. (2004). Serpentinites, Peridotites, and Seismology. <em>International Geology Review</em>, <em>46</em>(9), 795-816. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.46.9.795</li> <li>Schuba, C.N., Schuba, J.P. Gray, G.G., and Davy, R.G., (2019). Interface targeted velocity estimation using machine learning. <em>Geophysical Journal International</em>, <em>218</em>(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz142</li> <li>Schuba, C.N.,&nbsp;Gray, G.G., Morgan, J.K., Schuba, J.P., and Sawyer, D.S., (submitted). Interface targeted velocity estimation using machine learning. <em>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.</em></li> </ul>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics