Replication Package for the Paper: "Rebasing in Code Review Considered Harmful"
<p>This is the replication package for the paper: "Rebasing in Code Review Considered Harmful: A Large-scale Empirical Investigation", published at the 19th IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM'19).</p> <p> </p> <p>The replication package is composed of the raw results from each of our 4 research questions. In addition, we include the results from the small empirical study we performed to evaluate the methodology we proposed to handle rebasing operations in code review data.</p> <p> </p> <p>Each of the reported results has been obtained by following the procedures and heuristics described in the paper.</p> <p> </p> <p>This publication uses the CROP dataset of code review data: <a href="https://crop-repo.github.io/">https://crop-repo.github.io/</a></p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0