Votes from interactive polls
<p>Questions asked to participants during the workshop</p> <ol> <li>What is your area of work?</li> <li>Where are you working?</li> <li>What is more important in using monitoring data for assessing water quality impacts from CSOs?</li> <li>What regulation is better: simple or complex?</li> <li>What are current barriers against data sharing?</li> <li>If you make your CSO data transparent [what happens?]</li> <li>Would be a regulatory push (similar to EPA) effective in the EU?</li> <li>Where do you see biggest gap in CSO management?</li> <li>What instruments would you personally prefer to improve CSO management? [not polled]</li> <li>CSO in your region/city are: [how visible?]</li> <li>When existing, data on CSO are accessible [by whom?]</li> <li>An assessment of CSO at EU scale is in your opinion: [how useful?]</li> <li>If you want to make data public, at which level should it be provided?</li> <li>How important is a common data model and format?</li> <li>What is more important in using monitoring data for assessing water quality impacts from CSOs?</li> <li>Where do you see biggest gap in CSO management?</li> <li>What are your preferred next steps? [word cloud]</li> </ol>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0