Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Fig. 2 in Living with liver flukes: Does migration matter?

Fig. 2. Liver fluke prevalence and intensity. Liver fluke prevalence (top; infected animals/all animals sampled) and liver fluke intensity (bottom; EPG) detected in faecal pellets of each elk migrant tactic at the population (left) and individual level (right) separated by sampling year (2017 in dark grey, 2018 in light grey). Bars represent 95% confidence intervals for prevalence and standard error for intensity. Significant differences within years (α = 0.5) are indicated with a,b,c where no letters indicate no significant difference.

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics

Dataset details

Repository
zenodo
Published
August 30, 2020
License
cc-by-4.0
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.13242245

Scored with release 0.9.0

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.