Fig. 3 in Analyzing the impact of conflictive dental characters on the phylogeny of octodontoid rodents

Fig. 3. Common mapping (union of the optimizations over MPT) of the character 67 on the consensus (according to outcome of cladistic analysis of Verzi et al. 2014), showing the occlusal patterns of terminals. Character states: 67-0 (green), 67-1 (blue), 67-2 (black), and ambiguity (red). Node Q shows the clade comprising traditional octodontines and the optimization at this node (character state 67-0). Node P indicates clade that clusters Acaremys and traditional octodontines. Node K (supported by the character-state 67-1; see Verzi et al. 2014: som 1d) indicates the grouping of Protadelphomys– Willidewu–Sallamys, Chasicomys, Chasichimys, and traditional ctenomyines (node N). Occlusal figures of terminals represent left m1 or m2 and were essentially modified from Verzi et al. (2014: fig. 8).