Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Fig. 5 in Constraints on the lamina density of laminar bone architecture of large-bodied dinosaurs and mammals

Fig. 5. Comparison of dinosaur and mammal lamina density. A test for normality of the combined distributions failed (which is common for large datasets), but descriptive statistics suggest the dataset may still be normal (skew [lopsidedness] = 0.449; kurtosis [peakedness or flatness] = -0.107). Mean mammal lamina density differs significantly from mean dinosaur lamina density (independent t-test, t = 5.928; p <0.001). A non-parametric alternative suggests an equally significant difference between the medians (Mann-Whitney U statistic = 752.0; two-tailed p value <0.001). For discussion of these results, please refer to the main text.

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics

Dataset details

Repository
zenodo
Published
October 17, 2013
License
cc-by-4.0
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.13277273

Scored with release 0.9.0

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.