Skip to main content
zenodoopen

StarDist_AsPC1_Lifeact

<p>This repository includes a StarDist deep learning model designed for segmenting AsPC1 cells labeled with Lifeact from fluorescence microscopy images. The model distinguishes individual AsPC1 cells within clusters and separates them from the background. The model was trained on a small dataset and achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.884 and an F1 Score of 0.967, indicating high accuracy in cell segmentation.</p> <h3>Specifications</h3> <ul> <li> <p>Model: StarDist for segmenting AsPC1 cells in fluorescence microscopy images</p> </li> <li> <p>Training Dataset:</p> </li> <ul> <li> <p>Number of Images: 10 paired fluorescence microscopy images and label masks</p> </li> <li> <p>Microscope: Spinning disk confocal microscope (3i CSU-W1) with a 20x objective, NA 0.8</p> </li> <li> <p>Data Type: Fluorescence microscopy images of the AsPC1 Lifeact channel with manually segmented masks</p> </li> <li> <p>File Format: TIFF (.tif)</p> </li> <ul> <li> <p>Fluorescence Images: 16-bit</p> </li> <li> <p>Masks: 8-bit</p> </li> </ul> <li> <p>Image Size: 1024 x 1024 pixels (Pixel size: 0.6337 x 0.6337 &micro;m&sup2;)</p> </li> </ul> <li> <p>Model Capabilities:</p> </li> <ul> <li> <p>Segment AsPC1 Cells: Detects individual AsPC1 cells from a cluster and separates them from the background</p> </li> <li> <p>Measure Intensity: Enables measurement of CD44, ICAM1, ICAM2, or Fibronectin intensity under individual cells in respective channels</p> </li> </ul> <li> <p>Performance:</p> </li> <ul> <li> <p>Average IoU: 0.884</p> </li> <li> <p>Average F1 Score: 0.967</p> </li> </ul> <li> <p>Model Training: Conducted using ZeroCostDL4Mic (<a href="https://github.com/HenriquesLab/ZeroCostDL4Mic/wiki/Stardist">https://github.com/HenriquesLab/ZeroCostDL4Mic/wiki</a>)</p> </li> </ul> <div> <h3>Reference</h3> <div><strong>Fast label-free live imaging reveals key roles of flow dynamics and CD44-HA interaction in cancer cell arrest on endothelial monolayers</strong></div> </div> <div>Gautier&nbsp;Follain,&nbsp;Sujan&nbsp;Ghimire,&nbsp;Joanna W.&nbsp;Pylv&auml;n&auml;inen,&nbsp;Monika&nbsp;Vaitkevičiūtė,&nbsp;Diana&nbsp;Wurzinger,&nbsp;Camilo&nbsp;Guzm&aacute;n,&nbsp;James RW&nbsp;Conway,&nbsp;Michal&nbsp;Dibus,&nbsp;Sanna&nbsp;Oikari,&nbsp;Kirsi&nbsp;Rilla,&nbsp;Marko&nbsp;Salmi,&nbsp;Johanna&nbsp;Ivaska,&nbsp;Guillaume&nbsp;Jacquemet</div> <div>bioRxiv&nbsp;2024.09.30.615654;&nbsp;doi:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.30.615654v1">https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.30.615654</a></div> <p>&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0