TABLE 1 in Description of new species of deep water Sthenolepis Willey, 1905 and Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from off Northern California, with the redescription of Sthenolepis spargens Fauchald, 1972
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Comparative table of the valid species of <i>Sthenolepis</i> Willey, 1905 (Read & Fauchald 2024), including the geographical and bathymetrical distribution. The number of times in sizes relationships between wide and length is given by ‘×’.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th><i>S. fimbriarum</i> (Hartman, 1939)</th><th><i>S. grubei</i> (Treadwell, 1901)</th><th><i>S. Japonica</i> (McIntosh, 1885)</th><th><i>S. Javanica</i> (Horst, 1917)</th><th><i>S. kuekenthali</i> Augener, 1922</th><th><i>S. melanocephala</i> (Horst, 1917)</th><th><i>S. oculata</i> (Hartman, 1942)</th><th><i>S. spargens</i> Fauchald, 1972</th><th><i>Leanira izuensis</i> Takahashi, 1938</th><th><i>Leanira vulturis</i> Horst, 1917</th><th><i>S. ruffi</i> <b>n. sp.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Type locality</th><td>Escondido Bay, off Carmen Island, Baja California, Mexico</td><td>Puerto Rico</td><td>Kobe, Japan</td><td>N coast of Java</td><td>Kingston, Jamaica</td><td>Molo Strait, Indonesia</td><td>Off Cayo Fragoso, Cuba</td><td>Mazatlán, Mexico</td><td>Izu Peninsula, Japan</td><td>Makassar, Indonesia</td><td>W of Farallon Islands, California, USA</td></tr><tr><th>Depth (m)</th><td>Shore–18.2</td><td>1</td><td>91.4</td><td>330</td><td>–</td><td>69–91</td><td>438</td><td>1,750–3,400</td><td>30–130</td><td>30.6–56</td><td>2,350–3,253</td></tr><tr><th>Median antenna style size compared to prostomium</th><td>Slightly longer</td><td>Shorter</td><td>2× as long</td><td>4× as long</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer, biarticulate</td><td>Half as long, biarticulate</td><td>4× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Auricle size compared to median ceratophore</th><td>Similar length</td><td>Slightly larger</td><td>½ as long</td><td>Similar length</td><td>–</td><td>Similar length</td><td>½ as long</td><td>½ as long</td><td>Similar length</td><td>½ as long</td><td>½ as long</td></tr><tr><th>Eyes</th><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td></tr><tr><th>Palps size (reach segment)</th><td>–</td><td>Segment 9</td><td>Approx. Segment 16</td><td>Segment 10</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 12</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 20</td><td>Segment 14</td><td>Approx. Segment 18</td><td>Segment 12</td></tr><tr><th>Tentacular cirri size compared to parapodia</th><td>Similar</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>2× as long</td><td>–</td><td>3× as long</td><td>–</td><td>12× as long</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>6× as long</td><td>5× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetae canaliculate</th><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present, may be absent in lowest neurochaetae</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetal handles (distal section)</th><td>Slightly spinose</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Subdistal tooth</td><td>–</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Enlarged subdistal tooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Small subdistal tooth</td></tr><tr><th>First branchiae</th><td>Segment 7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 5</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 5</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 2</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 2</td></tr><tr><th>Elytral surface/</th><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Granular/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Granular/Smooth</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>–</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td></tr><tr><th>Margin</th><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Anterior ones with fimbriae, posterior ones smooth</td><td></td><td>Smooth</td><td></td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td></tr><tr><th>Reference</th><td>Hartman 1939</td><td>Treadwell 1901</td><td>McIntosh, 1885; Uschakov & Wu 1959; Imajima 1997</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>Augener 1922</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>Hartman 1942</td><td>Fauchald 1972; this study</td><td>Takahashi 1938</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>This study</td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>Sthenolepis gracilior</i> Augener, 1927 was deliberately kept out of this table due to the lack of morphological details in the original description, which may agree or disagree with <i>Sthenolepis</i> but to other morphologically close genera such as <i>Horstileanira</i> or <i>Labiosthenolepis</i>. Currently, <i>Leanira izuensis</i> and <i>L. vulturis</i> are junior synonyms of <i>Ehlersileanira incisa</i> (Grube, 1877); however, here they are considered in the table due to the past combination under the genus-group name <i>Sthenolepis</i> and the current unclear specific status (Hartman 1965; Cruz-Gomez 2022b).</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 8
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0
Topics
ScienceDex for faculty
Your academic CV and NIH biosketch
Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.