zenodoopen

TABLE 4 in A New Species of the Rodent Genus Oecomys (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini) from Eastern Bolivia, with Emended Definitions of O. concolor (Wagner) and O. mamorae (Thomas)

TABLE 4 External and Craniodental Measurements for the Type Series of O. sydandersoni, New Species, and Samples of O. concolor and O. mamorae (Sample statistics include the mean, ± 1 standard deviation, and the observed range).<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>O. sydandersoni Holotype</th><th>O. sydandersoni El Refugio</th><th>O. concolor Amazonas, Brazil</th><th>O. mamorae Beni, Bolivia</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Variable</th><td>(MNK 2679)</td><td>(N = 21–23)</td><td>(N = 23, 24)</td><td>(N = 14–16)</td></tr><tr><th>TOTL</th><td>242</td><td>257.9 ± 16.7 233–290</td><td>273.2 ± 11.2 255–296</td><td>296.0 ± 18.3 270–230</td></tr><tr><th>HBL</th><td>118</td><td>125.0 ± 12.2 109–166</td><td>125.4 ± 5.8 115–141</td><td>139.8 ± 13.1 120–170</td></tr><tr><th>TL</th><td>124</td><td>132.8 ± 8.4 115–145</td><td>147.9 ± 6.9 137–160</td><td>158.5 ± 10.7 144–180</td></tr><tr><th>HFL</th><td>23</td><td>24.1 ± 1.7 21–27</td><td>27.4 ± 1.1 26–29</td><td>27.3 ± 1.8 23–30</td></tr><tr><th>EL</th><td>17</td><td>16.4 ± 1.1 15–19</td><td>17.1 ± 1.3 15–20</td><td>18.0 ± 1.2 17–20</td></tr><tr><th>WT</th><td>45</td><td>44.9 ± 7.8 30–57</td><td>57.8 ± 9.5 41–80</td><td>73.9 ± 29.9 48–120</td></tr><tr><th>ONL</th><td>30.7</td><td>29.8 ± 1.2 27.7–32.0</td><td>32.2 ± 0.9 30.2–34.3</td><td>32.5 ± 1.2 30.9–34.5</td></tr><tr><th>ZB</th><td>16.7</td><td>16.5 ± 0.6 15.3–17.6</td><td>17.7 ± 0.6 16.6–19.1</td><td>17.1 ± 0.7 15.6–18.1</td></tr><tr><th>BBC</th><td>11.8</td><td>11.8 ± 0.3 11.3–12.4</td><td>12.5 ± 0.4 11.8–13.3</td><td>12.6 ± 0.3 12.0–13.2</td></tr><tr><th>DBC</th><td>9.5</td><td>9.1 ± 0.3 8.5–9.7</td><td>9.4 ± 0.3 8.8–9.9</td><td>9.3 ± 0.5 7.7–10.0</td></tr><tr><th>BOC</th><td>6.6</td><td>6.5 ± 0.1 6.3–6.8</td><td>6.8 ± 0.2 6.4–7.3</td><td>7.3 ± 0.4 6.6–7.8</td></tr><tr><th>IOB</th><td>5.4</td><td>5.3 ± 0.3 4.8–5.7</td><td>5.5 ± 0.2 5.1–6.0</td><td>4.9 ± 0.2 4.6–5.2</td></tr><tr><th>LR</th><td>8.2</td><td>8.4 ± 0.5 7.5–9.1</td><td>9.1 ± 0.4 8.4–9.9</td><td>9.1 ± 0.4 8.6–10.0</td></tr><tr><th>BR</th><td>5.4</td><td>5.5 ± 0.3 4.7–6.2</td><td>6.1 ± 0.3 5.5–6.7</td><td>5.8 ± 0.3 5.4–6.2</td></tr><tr><th>PPL</th><td>10.4</td><td>10.3 ± 0.5 9.2–11.4</td><td>10.6 ± 0.4 9.9–11.4</td><td>11.3 ± 0.5 10.4–12.0</td></tr><tr><th>BPL</th><td>5.7</td><td>5.6 ± 0.3 4.9–6.0</td><td>6.6 ± 0.3 5.9–7.3</td><td>6.1 ± 0.4 5.4–6.9</td></tr><tr><th>LIF</th><td>5.6</td><td>5.4 ± 0.3 4.9–5.8</td><td>5.3 ± 0.3 4.5–6.2</td><td>5.8 ± 0.3 5.3–6.3</td></tr><tr><th>BIF</th><td>2.6</td><td>2.6 ± 0.2 2.2–2.8</td><td>2.3 ± 0.2 1.8–2.7</td><td>2.5 ± 0.3 2.0–2.9</td></tr><tr><th>LD</th><td>7.4</td><td>7.7 ± 0.5 6.8–8.7</td><td>8.1 ± 0.4 7.6–9.1</td><td>8.0 ± 0.5 7.2–8.7</td></tr><tr><th>BBP</th><td>5.7</td><td>5.7 ± 0.2 5.2–6.2</td><td>6.1 ± 0.2 5.7–6.4</td><td>5.9 ± 0.3 5.4–6.4</td></tr><tr><th>Variable</th><td>(MNK 2679)</td><td>(N = 21–23)</td><td>(N = 23, 24)</td><td>(N = 14–16)</td></tr><tr><th>BZP</th><td>3.2</td><td>2.9 ± 0.2 2.5–3.2</td><td>3.3 ± 0.2 2.9–3.6</td><td>3.4 ± 0.3 2.8–3.9</td></tr><tr><th>CLM</th><td>4.80</td><td>4.57 ± 0.14 4.35–4.90</td><td>4.93 ± 0.13 4.70–5.10</td><td>5.04 ± 0.21 4.70–5.40</td></tr><tr><th>WM1</th><td>1.40</td><td>1.32 ± 0.05 1.25–1.40</td><td>1.40 ± 0.06 1.30–1.50</td><td>1.39 ± 0.09 1.30–1.50</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship: 8
Harmonization: 4
Access: 16
Reuse readiness: 8
Engagement: 0

Topics

Biodiversity Taxonomy