zenodoopen

Table 4 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 4. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of L. (L.) albemarlensis and L. (L.) isodictyalis. Shass length × width; head diameter are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and sigmas. Values in parentheses are means<table><tbody><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis material examined</th><th>Styles</th><th>Tylotes</th><th>Arcuate isochelae</th><th>Sigmas</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>AHF-1736-49</th><td>150–(161.5)–175 × 2.5–(3.4)–5</td><td>165–(175.1)–185 × 2.5–(2.5)–5; 4.5–(5.5)–7</td><td>17.5–(24.8)–30</td><td>15–(26.3)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>AHF-608-36</th><td>160–(169.2)–180 × 2.5–(3.5)–5</td><td>180–(193.3)–205 × 2.5–(3.1)–5</td><td>17.5–(21.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(18.5)–25</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-27</th><td>150–(169.5)–185 × 2.5–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>125–(178.6)–200 × 2.5–(3)–5; 3.8–(5)–6.3</td><td>11.3–(20.5)–32</td><td>15–(28.2)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-183</th><td>142.5–(159.5)–180 × 2.5–(4.2)–6.3</td><td>155–(170.3)–205 × 2.5–(4)–6.3; 5–(5.9)–7.5</td><td>20–(27)–30</td><td>20–(26.6)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-190</th><td>150–(166)–187.5 × 2.5–(4.9)–8.8</td><td>153.8–(172.5)–185 × 2.5–(3.6)–5; 3.8–(6)–8.8</td><td>12.5–(18.3)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(25.9)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-191</th><td>142.5–(172.2)–185 × 1.3–(5.2)–8.8</td><td>162–(178.8)–195 × 2.5–(3.5)–5; 5–(5.9)–7</td><td>12.5–(17.2)–27.5</td><td>15–(26)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-193</th><td>135–(157.5)–185 × 1.3–(4.3)–6.3</td><td>150–(174)–190 × 2.5–(3.9)–5; 5–(5.7)–6.3</td><td>22.5–(25.5)–30</td><td>20–(26.3)–35</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-232</th><td>170–(183.4)–195 × 2.5–(5.9)–10</td><td>127.5–(172.8)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>10–(19.4)–30</td><td>15–(25.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-720</th><td>165–(177.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.7)–5</td><td>170–(181.6)–200 × 2.5–(3.3)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.3)–27.5</td><td>15–(27.0)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1018</th><td>145–(160.2)–175 × 2.5–(2.5)–2.5</td><td>180–(195.8)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>22.5–(25.9)–30</td><td>15–(23.4)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1104</th><td>150–(157.9)–175 × 2.5–(3.8)–5</td><td>175–(187.9)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>17.5–(23.3)–27.5</td><td>20–(26.1)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1369</th><td>150–(162.8)–180 × 2.5–(2.8)–5</td><td>170–(186.5)–200 × 2.5–(2.6)–5</td><td>20–(25.7)–30</td><td>20–(23.3)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1443</th><td>145–(161.6)–175 × 2.5–(3.0)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>20–(23.4)–30</td><td>20–(25.1)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1553</th><td>150–(160.4)–180 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>170–(180.9)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>15–(24.1)–30</td><td>17.5–(23.5)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1579</th><td>155–(170.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>180–(186.5)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(19.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1581</th><td>150–(169.2)–185 × 2.5–(3.2)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–200 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.9)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(28.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2374</th><td>125–(150.3)–175 × 2–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(171.3)–190 × 3–(5)–6; 5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–32</td><td>15–(26)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2377</th><td>167.5–(185)–198 × 2.5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(190)–200 × 2.5–(4.2)–5; 5–(5.5)–6.3</td><td>12.5–(22.2)–31.3</td><td>17.5–(33.6)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2379</th><td>142.5–(158)–165 × 1.3–(6.2)–7.5</td><td>120–(167)–182.5 × 2.5–(4.3)–5; 3.8–(4.8)–5.5</td><td>17.5–(25.3)–32.5</td><td>20–(26.5)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>For comparison (non-examined material)</th></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis from Desqueyroux-Faúndez and Van Soest 1997</th><td>123–(157)–190 × 4–8</td><td>107–(139)–170 × 5</td><td>16–26</td><td>16–26</td></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) isodictyalis (Carter, 1882); from Rützler et al. 2007</th><td>148.6–(164.6)–175.2 × 3.8–(4.8)–5.7</td><td>177.9–(198.3)–207.9 × 3.1–(3.9)–4.2</td><td>19.6–(26.3)–41.4</td><td>18.3(21)–22.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship: 8
Harmonization: 8
Access: 8
Reuse readiness: 8
Engagement: 0

Topics

Biodiversity Taxonomy