Table 3 in A late Eocene wood assemblage from the Crooked River Basin, Oregon, USA
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Comparison of urticalean woods. <b>POR</b> =porosity, <b>DP</b> =diffuse-porous, <b>SRP</b> =semi-ring-porous, <b>RP</b> =ring-porous; <b>V Grp</b> =vessel grouping, <b>S</b> =solitary, <b>Rm</b> =radiatl multiples; <b>V Arr</b> =vessel arrangement, <b>Ran</b> =random, <b>Diag</b> =diagonal; <b>IVP</b> =horizontal diameter of intervessel pits in µm; <b>VRP</b> =vessel-ray parenchyma pits, <b>Sim</b> =similar to intervssel pitting, <b>Red</b> =reduced borders to simple; <b>RW</b> =ray width in cell number; <b>Rcp</b> =ray cellular comosition, <b>Ho</b> =homocellular, <b>He</b> =heterocellular rays, number of marginal rows of upright/square cells in parentheses; <b>ShC</b> =sheath cells, <b>Ab</b> =absent, <b>Occ</b> =occasional; <b>Ax Par</b> =axial parenchyma distribution, <b>Sc</b> =scanty paratracheal, <b>V</b> =vasicentric, <b>Al</b> =aliform, <b>Cf</b> =confluent, <b>Bnd</b> =banded, <b>M</b> =marginal; <b>Cry</b> =crystals, <b>AB</b> =absent, <b>RP</b> =present in ray parenchyma, <b>A</b> =present in axial parenchyma;<b>?</b> =no information; <b>*</b> =small axis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>UF.278 WOODS</th><th>POR</th><th>V Grp</th><th>V Arr</th><th>IVP</th><th>VRP</th><th>RW</th><th>Rcp</th><th>ShC</th><th>Ax Par</th><th><b>Cry</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Urticaleoxylon stevensii</i> / UF 278-84893</th><td>SRP</td><td>S-Rm (2–3)</td><td>Ran</td><td>8–11</td><td>Sim/ Red</td><td>1–6</td><td>Ho, He (1)</td><td>Ab</td><td>Sc, V, Al, Cf, M</td><td>RP</td></tr><tr><th><i>Moroxylon</i>?/ UF 278-84899</th><td>RP</td><td>S-Rms (Cl)</td><td>Diag</td><td>8–11</td><td>Sim/ Red</td><td>1–3 (–4)</td><td>Ho, He (1–2)</td><td>Ab</td><td>Cf, M</td><td>Ab</td></tr><tr><th>Cannabaceae / Moraceae Wood Type 1 UF 278-84894</th><td>DP</td><td>S-Rm (2–3)</td><td>Ran</td><td>8 –12</td><td>Sim/ Red</td><td>1–6</td><td>Ho, He</td><td>Occ</td><td>Sc, V, M</td><td>Ab</td></tr><tr><th>Cannabaceae / Moraceae Wood Type 2 UF 278-84906 <b>NUT BEDS</b></th><td>? *</td><td>S-Rm (2–3)</td><td>Ran</td><td>8–13</td><td>Red</td><td>to 6</td><td>He</td><td>Occ</td><td>Vc, Cf?</td><td>RP</td></tr><tr><th><i>Scottoxylon eocenicum</i> Clarno Urticalean Wood I</th><td>DP DP</td><td>S-Rm S-Rm</td><td>Ran Ran</td><td>5 –12 8–12</td><td>Red Red</td><td>1–7 1–8</td><td>Ho, He Het</td><td>Occ Ab</td><td>V, Al, Cf, M Bnd</td><td>Ab RP</td></tr><tr><th>Clarno Urticalean Wood 2</th><td>DP</td><td>S-Rm</td><td>Ran</td><td>5–8</td><td>Sim/ Red</td><td>1–4</td><td>Het</td><td>Ab</td><td>V, Al, Cf</td><td>RP (A)</td></tr></tbody></table>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0