Table 2 in Impacts of Wastewater Effluent on Temperate Stream Fish Assemblage Structure

<p>Table 2. Similarity percentage (SIMPER) showing species contributions (Contrib%) to dissimilarity between East and West Fork sites. West and East Fork average abundance (Av.Abund) columns list the transformed mean abundances for species in both forks, &lsquo;Diss/SD&rsquo; represents the ratio between the average dissimilarity and standard deviation, and the cumulative % (Cum.%) column lists the cumulative dissimilarity across species with a 90% cutoff. The average dissimilarity between the East and West Forks was 58.74%.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Species</b></th><th><b>West Fork</b> <b>Av.Abund</b></th><th><b>East Fork</b> <b>Av.Abund</b></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr><tr><th><b>Av.Diss</b></th><th><b>Diss/SD</b></th><th><b>Contrib%</b></th><th><b>Cum.%</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Etheostoma spectabile</i></th><td>4.38</td><td>2.34</td><td>13.7</td><td>1.53</td><td>23.32</td><td>23.32</td></tr><tr><th><i>Etheostoma flabellare</i></th><td>0</td><td>2.26</td><td>11.97</td><td>1.73</td><td>20.38</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><th><i>Chrosomus erythrogaster</i></th><td>1.36</td><td>0.24</td><td>6.23</td><td>0.78</td><td>10.61</td><td>54.3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Noturus exilis</i></th><td>0.32</td><td>1.15</td><td>6.16</td><td>1.19</td><td>10.49</td><td>64.79</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cottus bairdii</i></th><td>1.32</td><td>1.72</td><td>5.97</td><td>1.27</td><td>10.17</td><td>74.96</td></tr><tr><th><i>Campostoma</i> sp.</th><td>1.15</td><td>0.45</td><td>5.62</td><td>1.18</td><td>9.57</td><td>84.54</td></tr><tr><th><i>Luxilus zonatus</i></th><td>0.71</td><td>0.2</td><td>3.82</td><td>0.84</td><td>6.51</td><td>91.05</td></tr></tbody></table>