Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Bark-scratching of storm-felled trees preserves biodiversity at lower economic costs compared to debarking

<p>The abundance data presented here focus on saproxylic beetles collected over two years on trees in a mountain forest ecosystem (analysed and discussed in Thorn et&nbsp;al. <a href="https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecm.1343#ecm1343-bib-0043">2016</a>). The design consists of 12 plots each composed of three experimentally felled trees, resulting in a total of 36 experimental felled trees. In each plot, the bark of one tree was completely removed, the bark of a second tree was only partially removed (i.e., bark-scratched), and the third tree served as a control. The design is thus composed of 12 replications of three different treatments (i.e., control, bark-scratched, and debarked). A total of 120 species of saproxylic beetles were trapped with emergence traps on felled trees (Thorn et&nbsp;al. <a href="https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecm.1343#ecm1343-bib-0043">2016</a>).</p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0