TABLE 5 in A new species of small-eared shrew of the genus Cryptotis (Mammalia, Eulipotyphla, Soricidae) from the northernmost Peruvian Andes
<p><b>TABLE 5.</b> Kimura’s two parameter (K2P) genetic distances among species of <i>Cryptotis</i> based on cytochrome b (A) and COI (B).</p><table><tbody><tr><th>A</th><th></th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th><th>4</th><th>5</th><th>6</th><th>7</th><th>8</th><th>9</th><th>10</th><th>11</th><th>12</th><th>13</th><th>14</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td><i>C. alticola</i></td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td><i>C. peregrina</i></td><td>0.107</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td><i>C. obscura</i></td><td>0.138</td><td>0.134</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td><i>C. mexicana</i></td><td>0.136</td><td>0.139</td><td>0.045</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td><i>C. mayensis</i></td><td>0.127</td><td>0.109</td><td>0.123</td><td>0.123</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td><i>C. phillipsii</i></td><td>0.155</td><td>0.140</td><td>0.123</td><td>0.130</td><td>0.148</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td><i>C. nelsoni</i></td><td>0.140</td><td>0.127</td><td>0.056</td><td>0.064</td><td>0.123</td><td>0.126</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td><i>C. magna</i></td><td>0.161</td><td>0.159</td><td>0.134</td><td>0.141</td><td>0.156</td><td>0.084</td><td>0.138</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td><i>C. goldmani</i></td><td>0.103</td><td>0.015</td><td>0.131</td><td>0.133</td><td>0.108</td><td>0.145</td><td>0.124</td><td>0.163</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>1</th><td><i>C. parva</i></td><td>0.136</td><td>0.131</td><td>0.164</td><td>0.158</td><td>0.150</td><td>0.192</td><td>0.144</td><td>0.194</td><td>0.128</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td><i>C. niausa</i></td><td>0.131</td><td>0.128</td><td>0.144</td><td>0.144</td><td>0.132</td><td>0.139</td><td>0.129</td><td>0.136</td><td>0.136</td><td>0.138</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>12</th><td><i>C. montivaga</i></td><td>0.120</td><td>0.112</td><td>0.124</td><td>0.124</td><td>0.110</td><td>0.141</td><td>0.129</td><td>0.149</td><td>0.118</td><td>0.150</td><td>0.123</td><td>-</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>13</th><td><i>C. evaristoi</i></td><td>0.112</td><td>0.117</td><td>0.142</td><td>0.138</td><td>0.120</td><td>0.144</td><td>0.135</td><td>0.161</td><td>0.117</td><td>0.141</td><td>0.138</td><td>0.097</td><td>-</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>14</th><td>Outgroup</td><td>0.145</td><td>0.159</td><td>0.152</td><td>0.149</td><td>0.168</td><td>0.172</td><td>0.133</td><td>0.163</td><td>0.157</td><td>0.166</td><td>0.150</td><td>0.164</td><td>0.163</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0