EJPSOIL - SoilX graphics
<p>SoilX graphics illustrate the differences between conventional and sustainable soil management practices. <span><span>Sustainable</span> <span>soil management practices include</span></span><span> </span></p> <div> <div> <ul> <li> <p><span><span>diversified crop rotations,</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span> </span></p> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div> <div> <ul> <li> <p><span><span>cover cropping,</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span> </span></p> </li> </ul> </div> <div> <ul> <li> <p><span><span>organic amendments,</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span> </span></p> </li> </ul> </div> <div> <ul> <li> <p><span><span>residue incorporation, and</span></span> <span><span> </span></span><span> </span></p> </li> </ul> </div> <div> <ul> <li> <p><span><span>reduced tillage.</span></span></p> </li> </ul> <p><span>The project hypothesis is that under sustainable management, agricultural soils are expected to accumlate more soil organic carbon and to develop</span><span><span> more favorable soil structure.</span></span></p> </div> </div>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4