Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Table 3 in The Mollusca of Galicia Bank (NE Atlantic Ocean)

<p><b>Table 3.</b> Contribution of the species to the similarity between samples.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Av. Abund</th><th>Av. Sim</th><th>Sim/ SD</th><th>Contrib. %</th><th><b><b>Cum.</b> %</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Group S (shallow). Average similarity: 16.93</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Limopsis minuta</i> (Philippi, 1836)</th><td>92.20</td><td>6.70</td><td>0.57</td><td>39.58</td><td>39.58</td></tr><tr><th><i>Lima</i> <i>marioni</i> P. Fischer, 1882</th><td>18.40</td><td>6.47</td><td>0.49</td><td>38.21</td><td>77.79</td></tr><tr><th><i>Antalis agililis</i> (M. Sars in G.O. Sars, 1872)</th><td>10.20</td><td>1.64</td><td>0.59</td><td>9.66</td><td>87.45</td></tr><tr><th><i>Asperarca nodulosa</i> (M&uuml;ller, 1776)</th><td>57.60</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.41</td><td>5.75</td><td>93.19</td></tr><tr><th><b>Group D (deep). Average similarity: 11.77</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Limopsis cristata</i> Jeffreys, 1876</th><td>340.50</td><td>5.16</td><td>0.59</td><td>43.84</td><td>43.84</td></tr><tr><th><i>Bathoxiphus ensiculus</i> (Jeffreys, 1877)</th><td>227.50</td><td>2.82</td><td>0.29</td><td>23.99</td><td>67.84</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fissidentalium capillosum</i> (Jeffreys, 1877)</th><td>43.83</td><td>1.12</td><td>0.84</td><td>9.53</td><td>77.36</td></tr><tr><th><i>Parvamussium propinquum</i> (E.A. Smith, 1885)</th><td>121.50</td><td>0.98</td><td>0.63</td><td>8.29</td><td>85.66</td></tr><tr><th><i>Propeamussium lucidum</i> (Jeffreys in Wyville-Thomson, 1873) <b>Groups S &amp; D. Average dissimilarity: 99.33</b></th><td>29.50</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.40</td><td>6.02</td><td>91.67</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics