zenodoopen

TABLE 1 in The Extinct Fauna of Stingless Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in Dominican Amber: Two New Species and Redescription of the Male of Proplebeia dominicana (Wille and Chandler)

<p>TABLE 1 <b>Measurements (mm) of Select Specimens of <i>Proplebeia dominicana</i></b> Holotype measurements are from the original descriptions by Wille and Chandler (1964).</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Male DR141178</th><th>Worker DR141111</th><th>Holotype, worker</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1. Head width</th><td>1.31</td><td>1.30</td><td>1.22 (72)</td></tr><tr><th>2. Head length</th><td>1.00</td><td>1.02</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>3. Mesosoma width</th><td>1.28</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>4. Tergum 2 width</th><td>0.98</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>5. Eye length</th><td>0.84</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.80 (47)</td></tr><tr><th>6. Eye width</th><td>0.40</td><td>0.36</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>7. Upper interorbital distance</th><td>0.75</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.76 (45)</td></tr><tr><th>8. Maximum interorbital distance</th><td>0.78</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.82 (48)</td></tr><tr><th>9. Lower interorbital distance</th><td>0.50</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.65 (38)</td></tr><tr><th>10. Clypeus length</th><td>0.34</td><td>0.23</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>11. Clypeus width</th><td>0.48</td><td>0.54</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>12. Clypeocellar distance</th><td>0.64</td><td>0.70</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>13. Malar area length</th><td>linear</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.05 (3)</td></tr><tr><th>14. Interalveolar distance</th><td>0.13</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.15 (9)</td></tr><tr><th>15. Alveolus diameter</th><td>0.14</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.12 (7)</td></tr><tr><th>16. Alveolorbital distance</th><td>0.10</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.17 (10)</td></tr><tr><th>17. Scape length</th><td>0.38</td><td>0.40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>18. Scape width</th><td>0.08</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>19. Length of pedicel plus flagellum</th><td>1.66</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>20. Alveoluslateral ocellus distance</th><td>0.55</td><td>0.58</td><td>0.65 (38)</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>(lateral ocellus?)</td></tr><tr><th>21. 1st flagellomere length</th><td>0.16</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>22. 2nd flagellomere length</th><td>0.15</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>23. 3rd flagellomere length</th><td>0.15</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>24. 3rd flagellomere diameter</th><td>0.09</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>25. Distance between lateral ocelli</th><td>0.34</td><td>0.26</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>26. Median ocellus diameter</th><td>0.14</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><th>27. Ocellorbital distance</th><td>0.11</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.17 (10)</td></tr><tr><th>28. Scutellum length: width</th><td>0.28:0.50</td><td>0.26:0.44</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>29. Mesoscutum length</th><td>—</td><td>0.80</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>30. Marginal cell length</th><td>0.91</td><td>0.92</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>31. Marginal cell width</th><td>0.20</td><td>0.21</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>32. Forewing length</th><td>2.75</td><td>2.68</td><td>2.60</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>(+tegula 3,12)</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>33. Forewing width</th><td>0.96</td><td>1.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>34. Tibia III length</th><td>0.92</td><td>0.96</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>35. Tibia III width</th><td>0.30</td><td>0.37</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>36. Basitarsus III length</th><td>0.52</td><td>0.42</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>37. Basitarsus III width</th><td>0.12</td><td>0.19</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>38. Hamuli</th><td>5–6</td><td>5</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>39. Pterostigma length: width</th><td>0.44:0.12</td><td>0.50:0.12</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>40. 1st abscissa of M</th><td>0.38</td><td>0.39</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>41. 1st abscissa of Cu</th><td>0.54</td><td>0.56</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>42. Rs + M + 2nd abscissa M</th><td>0.36</td><td>0.40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>43. Total body length</th><td>3.68</td><td>3.20</td><td>2.95</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship: 8
Harmonization: 8
Access: 16
Reuse readiness: 8
Engagement: 0

Topics

Biodiversity Taxonomy