Table 1 in Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Overview of study design, explaining which datasets and analyses were used to answer our primary questions.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Question</th><th>Data</th><th>Programme</th><th>Analysis</th></tr><tr><th><i>Phylogenetic analyses</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1. Is <i>Lasius</i> monophyletic?</th><td>89 taxa, 959 UCE locus alignments</td><td>UCEs: ASTRAL-II</td><td>UCE: summary coalescence</td></tr><tr><td>135 taxa, 11 Sanger loci</td><td>Sanger: MRBAYES</td><td>135 taxa, 11 Sanger loci: Bayesian tree inference, and maximum likelihood bootstrap</td></tr><tr><td>55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci</td><td>3.2.6, IQ-TREE</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci: stepping stone, concordance factor</td></tr><tr><th>2. Are the subgenera of <i>Lasius</i> monophyletic?</th><td>55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci</td><td>MRBAYES 3.2.6, IQ-TREE</td><td>Bayesian: Bayesian tree inference, stepping stone ML; maximum likelihood bootstrap, concordance factor</td></tr><tr><th>3. What are the relationships of fossil Formicinae?</th><td>154 taxa: 11 Sanger loci for 135 extant taxa, and 110 binary morphological characters for 136 extant and 18 extinct taxa</td><td>MRBAYES 3.2.6</td><td>Tree search: (clock vs nonclock; morphology-only vs combined data)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Evolutionary history</i></th></tr><tr><th>4. Under what palaeoclimatological conditions and where biogeographically did the Lasiini and its internal clades originate?</th><td>135 extant taxon, 11 Sanger loci chronogram trimmed from 154 taxon tree generated in Question 3</td><td>BIOGEOBEARS</td><td>BIOGEOBEARS: several models (with and without +J)</td></tr><tr><th>5. What was the evolutionary sequence of transformation for taxonomically important characters and life-history traits?</th><td>135 taxon chronogram from Question 4, 5 binary morphological characters and 1 ternary morphological character; 21 taxon chronogram trimmed from Question 3, 2 binary life-history traits</td><td>R (<i>ape</i>)</td><td><i>ace</i> with ER (equal rates) versus</td></tr><tr><th><i>Taxonomy</i></th></tr><tr><th>6. What are the morphological states that define the Lasiini and focal clades therein?</th><td>Qualitative comparisons (various)</td><td>Qualitative: n/a</td><td>Qualitative: Key + Tabulation</td></tr><tr><td>Morphometrics (104 specimens, 56 spp.)</td><td>Quantitative: R</td><td>Quantitative: Plotting</td></tr><tr><td>(ggplot)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0