Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Table 6 in Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

<p><b>Table 6.</b> Results of ANOVA tests on alternative ancestral state estimation models.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Divergence dating</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>Biogeography reconstruction</th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>FBD IGRclock</td><td></td><td>FBDTK02 clock</td><td></td><td>UniformIGRclock</td><td>Uniform TK 02 clock</td><td></td><td>DEC (lnL &minus; 136.77)</td><td>DIVALIKE (lnL &minus; 132.24)</td><td>BAYAREALIKE (lnL &minus; 150.98)</td></tr><tr><th>Node</th><td>Meanage(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Meanage(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Mean age(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Mean age (95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td></tr><tr><th>LasiiniCore LasiiniMetalasius + Prenolepis g. grp.</th><td>70.0 (57.6 &ndash;82.7) 62.3 (51.2 &ndash;72.9) 51.1 (42.2 &ndash;60.2)</td><td>0.990.940.99</td><td>97.2 (89.6 &ndash; 106.0) 88.6 (79.8 &ndash; 97.8) 71.0 (60.8 &ndash; 81.9)</td><td>0.910.641.00</td><td>80.8(68.6 &ndash; 91.8) 72.5(59.0 &ndash; 85.4) 59.9(48.7 &ndash;72.8)</td><td>0.96 0.94 0.99</td><td>100.0 (90.9 &ndash; 112.3) 92.0 (83.5 &ndash; 102.2) 75.6 (65.1 &ndash; 86.5)</td><td>0.94 0.49 1.00</td><td>PI P P</td><td>0.33 0.42 0.40</td><td>PI P P</td><td>0.37 0.56 0.53</td><td>PI PI PI</td><td>0.43 0.43 0.48</td></tr><tr><th><i>Prenolepis</i> g. grp. <i>Lasius</i> g. grp. Crown Lasiusniger clade <i>flavus</i> clade <i>Myrmecocystus</i></th><td>39.0 (36.5 &ndash;50.9) 24.9 (18.0 &ndash; 33.0) 21.9 (15.3 &ndash; 28.6) 15.8 (10.0 &ndash; 21.6) 15.7 (10.4 &ndash; 21.0) 14.6 (7.3 &ndash; 21.5)</td><td><b>0.471.000.771.001.001.00</b></td><td><b>53.1 (43.6 &ndash; 62.6) 67.9 (54.9 &ndash; 81.6) 63.7 (52.4 &ndash; 75.1) 53.2 (41.2 &ndash; 65.3) 49.1 (36.7 &ndash; 61.8) 47.9 (33.5 &ndash; 63.1)</b></td><td><b>1.000.990.630.701.001.00</b></td><td><b>50.9(40.8 &ndash; 61.3) 31.1(22.4 &ndash; 40.5) <i>27.3(19.4 &ndash; 35.6)</i> 20.0(12.7 &ndash; 27.7) 19.7(13.2&ndash; 26.8)</b> 17.8(8.9 &ndash; 26.9)</td><td>1.00 0.99 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00</td><td>57.0 (48.2 &ndash; 66.5) 73.7 (61.9 &ndash; 88.3) 64.3 (58.4 &ndash; 82.2) 60.6 (46.1 &ndash; 73.0) 55.9 (41.1 &ndash; 69.4) 55.8 (40.0 &ndash; 69.8)</td><td>1.00 0.99 0.71 0.56 1.00 1.00</td><td>PI NaP P P Na Na</td><td>0.42 0.53 0.72 0.87 0.71 0.87</td><td>PI Na P P Na Na</td><td>0.50 0.55 0.71 0.99 0.90 0.97</td><td><b>PI NaP NaP NaP NaP Na</b></td><td><b><b>0.64 0.84 0.87 0.62</b> 0.91</b> 0.53</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

20/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
8
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
0

Topics

Dataset details

Repository
zenodo
Published
January 9, 2022
License
notspecified
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.14048627

Scored with release 0.9.0

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.