Table 6 in Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
<p><b>Table 6.</b> Results of ANOVA tests on alternative ancestral state estimation models.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Divergence dating</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>Biogeography reconstruction</th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>FBD IGRclock</td><td></td><td>FBDTK02 clock</td><td></td><td>UniformIGRclock</td><td>Uniform TK 02 clock</td><td></td><td>DEC (lnL − 136.77)</td><td>DIVALIKE (lnL − 132.24)</td><td>BAYAREALIKE (lnL − 150.98)</td></tr><tr><th>Node</th><td>Meanage(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Meanage(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Mean age(95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Mean age (95 % HPD)</td><td>PP</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td><td>Range</td><td>Likelihood</td></tr><tr><th>LasiiniCore LasiiniMetalasius + Prenolepis g. grp.</th><td>70.0 (57.6 –82.7) 62.3 (51.2 –72.9) 51.1 (42.2 –60.2)</td><td>0.990.940.99</td><td>97.2 (89.6 – 106.0) 88.6 (79.8 – 97.8) 71.0 (60.8 – 81.9)</td><td>0.910.641.00</td><td>80.8(68.6 – 91.8) 72.5(59.0 – 85.4) 59.9(48.7 –72.8)</td><td>0.96 0.94 0.99</td><td>100.0 (90.9 – 112.3) 92.0 (83.5 – 102.2) 75.6 (65.1 – 86.5)</td><td>0.94 0.49 1.00</td><td>PI P P</td><td>0.33 0.42 0.40</td><td>PI P P</td><td>0.37 0.56 0.53</td><td>PI PI PI</td><td>0.43 0.43 0.48</td></tr><tr><th><i>Prenolepis</i> g. grp. <i>Lasius</i> g. grp. Crown Lasiusniger clade <i>flavus</i> clade <i>Myrmecocystus</i></th><td>39.0 (36.5 –50.9) 24.9 (18.0 – 33.0) 21.9 (15.3 – 28.6) 15.8 (10.0 – 21.6) 15.7 (10.4 – 21.0) 14.6 (7.3 – 21.5)</td><td><b>0.471.000.771.001.001.00</b></td><td><b>53.1 (43.6 – 62.6) 67.9 (54.9 – 81.6) 63.7 (52.4 – 75.1) 53.2 (41.2 – 65.3) 49.1 (36.7 – 61.8) 47.9 (33.5 – 63.1)</b></td><td><b>1.000.990.630.701.001.00</b></td><td><b>50.9(40.8 – 61.3) 31.1(22.4 – 40.5) <i>27.3(19.4 – 35.6)</i> 20.0(12.7 – 27.7) 19.7(13.2– 26.8)</b> 17.8(8.9 – 26.9)</td><td>1.00 0.99 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00</td><td>57.0 (48.2 – 66.5) 73.7 (61.9 – 88.3) 64.3 (58.4 – 82.2) 60.6 (46.1 – 73.0) 55.9 (41.1 – 69.4) 55.8 (40.0 – 69.8)</td><td>1.00 0.99 0.71 0.56 1.00 1.00</td><td>PI NaP P P Na Na</td><td>0.42 0.53 0.72 0.87 0.71 0.87</td><td>PI Na P P Na Na</td><td>0.50 0.55 0.71 0.99 0.90 0.97</td><td><b>PI NaP NaP NaP NaP Na</b></td><td><b><b>0.64 0.84 0.87 0.62</b> 0.91</b> 0.53</td></tr></tbody></table>
ShareScore
20/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0
Topics
Dataset details
- Repository
- zenodo
- Published
- January 9, 2022
- License
- notspecified
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.14048627
Scored with release 0.9.0
ScienceDex for faculty
Your academic CV and NIH biosketch
Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.