Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Missing Citations in COCI: Publishers Analytics Result

<p>This dataset contains a JSON&nbsp;file containing the results retrieved through the<a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4735621"> software developed by the authors</a>. We opted for JSON file format to store the obtained data, since this format allows the storage of heterogeneous information in a complex and structured way. The four main structures stored in the present file are:&nbsp;</p> <p>1) &quot;publishers&quot;, a list of dictionaries representing each publisher encountered;</p> <p>2) &quot;citations&quot;, a dictionary containing two lists, the one storing the validated citational data and the other storing the still invalid citational data. Each processed citation&nbsp;is represented as a dictionary.&nbsp;</p> <p>3) &quot;total_num_of_valid_citations&quot;, whose value is the number of citational data that could be validated throughout the process implemented by our software.</p> <p>4)&nbsp;&quot;external_data_for_unrecognized_prefixes&quot;: a dictionary of dictionaries representing the publishers we didn&#39;t find on Crossref, but that were identified through other online services.&nbsp;</p> <p>We used as input material open data from the dataset &ldquo;<a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625300">Citations to invalid DOI-identified entities obtained from processing DOI-to-DOI citations to add in COCI</a>&rdquo;.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
12
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4

Topics