Skip to main content
zenodoopen

FIGURES 1–6. Phylogenetic relationships proposed for the Bibionomorpha major clades. 1 in Phylogeny of the Mycetophiliformia, with proposal of the subfamilies Heterotrichinae, Ohakuneinae, and Chiletrichinae for the Rangomaramidae (Diptera, Bibionomorpha)

FIGURES 1–6. Phylogenetic relationships proposed for the Bibionomorpha major clades. 1. Proposal of Wood & Borkent (1989), with the exclusion of the Anisopodiformia. 2. Matile's (1990) analysis of the Mycetophiliformia. 3. Chandler's (2002) study, with the inclusion of the genera of difficult placement within the Mycetophiliformia. 4. The relationships proposed by Jaschhof & Didham (2002) for Sciaridae, Cecidomyiidae, and Rangomaramidae. 5. Relationships proposed by Hippa & Vilkamaa (2005) for the Mycetophiliformia, including only recent taxa. 6. Same, including fossil taxa (not shown).

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
12
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics