zenodoopen
FIGURES 1–6. Phylogenetic relationships proposed for the Bibionomorpha major clades. 1 in Phylogeny of the Mycetophiliformia, with proposal of the subfamilies Heterotrichinae, Ohakuneinae, and Chiletrichinae for the Rangomaramidae (Diptera, Bibionomorpha)
FIGURES 1–6. Phylogenetic relationships proposed for the Bibionomorpha major clades. 1. Proposal of Wood & Borkent (1989), with the exclusion of the Anisopodiformia. 2. Matile's (1990) analysis of the Mycetophiliformia. 3. Chandler's (2002) study, with the inclusion of the genera of difficult placement within the Mycetophiliformia. 4. The relationships proposed by Jaschhof & Didham (2002) for Sciaridae, Cecidomyiidae, and Rangomaramidae. 5. Relationships proposed by Hippa & Vilkamaa (2005) for the Mycetophiliformia, including only recent taxa. 6. Same, including fossil taxa (not shown).
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0