Telerehabilitation program for COVID-19 survivors (TERECO) - Randomized controlled trial
<p><b>Objectives</b></p> <p>To investigate superiority of a telerehabilitation program for Covid-19 (TERECO) over no rehabilitation with regard to exercise capacity, lower-limb muscle strength (LMS), pulmonary function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and dyspnoea.</p> <p><b>Design</b></p> <p>Parallel-group randomised controlled-trial with 1:1 block-randomisation.</p> <p><b>Setting</b></p> <p>Three major hospitals from Jiangsu and Hubei provinces, China.</p> <p><b>Participants</b></p> <p>120 formerly hospitalised Covid-19 survivors with remaining dyspnoea complaints were randomised with 61 allocated to control and 59 to TERECO.</p> <p><b>Intervention</b></p> <p>Unsupervised home-based 6-week exercise program comprising breathing control and thoracic expansion, aerobic exercise, and LMS exercise, delivered via smartphone, and remotely monitored with heart rate telemetry.</p> <p><b>Outcomes</b></p> <p>Primary outcome was 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) in metres. Secondary outcomes were squat time in seconds; pulmonary function assessed by spirometry; HRQOL measured with SF-12; and mMRC-dyspnoea. Outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks (post-treatment) and 28 weeks (follow-up).</p> <p><b>Results</b></p> <p>Adjusted between-group difference in change in 6MWD was 65.45 metres (95% CI 43.8, 87.1; p<0.001) at post-treatment and 68.62 metres (95% CI 46.39, 90.85; p<0.001) at follow-up. Treatment effects for LMS were 20.12 seconds (95% CI 12.34, 27.9; p<0.001) post-treatment and 22.23 seconds (95% CI 14.24, 30.21; p<0.001) at follow-up. No group differences were found for lung function except post-treatment MVV. Increase in SF-12 physical component was greater in the TERECO group with treatment effects estimated as 3.79 (95% CI 1.24, 6.35; p=0.004) at post-treatment and 2.69 (95% CI 0.06, 5.32; p=0.045) at follow-up.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b></p> <p>This trial demonstrated superiority of TERECO over no rehabilitation for 6MWD, LMS, and physical HRQOL.</p> <p><b>Trial registration</b>: ChiCTR2000031834, URL: <a href="http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=52216">http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=52216</a></p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 0
- Harmonization
- 12
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 8
Dataset details
- Repository
- dryad
- Published
- July 10, 2021
- License
- cc-zero
- DOI
- 10.5061/dryad.59zw3r27n
Scored with release 0.9.0
ScienceDex for faculty
Your academic CV and NIH biosketch
Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.