Measuring Disagreement in Science
<p>This data set contains data used in the project <em>Measuring Disagreement in Science</em> documented in the following preprint: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14641">arXiv:2107.14641</a>. The data set contains the following data:</p> <ul> <li>The 65 disagreement queries (signal phrase, filter phrase, valid or not, number of citing sentences returned by the query, SQL query). Of the 65 queries, 23 passed our 80% validity threshold.</li> <li>The 455,625 citing sentences identified by the 23 validated disagreement queries (DOI, sentence sequence number, queries by which the sentence was identified, sentence text).</li> <li>The publications in which the citing sentences occur (DOI, publication year, number of sentences in the main text, main field to which the publication was assigned, meso-level field to which the publication was assigned, inferred gender of the first and last author).</li> </ul> <p>The data was retrieved through the Elsevier ScienceDirect API subject to <a href="https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/text-and-data-mining">Elsevier’s policy for text and data mining</a>.</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0