Skip to main content
dryadopen

Effect of modulation periods on the mechanical and tribological performance of MoS2-TiL/MoS2-TiH multilayer coatings

<p class="18">MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>L</span></sub>/MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>H</span></sub> multilayered coatings (where L and H represent low- and high-powered of the sputtering <span>titanium</span> target) exhibit excellent mechanical and tribological performance owing to their multilayered microstructure. Herein, the effect of two different modulation periods on the mechanical and tribological performance of the multilayered coatings was studied. The performance of the coatings were found to depend on modulation periods of single layer thickness and thickness ratio respectively. When the thickness ratio of MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>L</span></sub> layer to MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>H</span></sub> layer is fixed with different number of layers, the adverse effects of the interface outweigh the beneficial effect; thus, the mechanical and tribological performance of the multilayered coatings are improved with an increase in the single layer thickness. When the effect of the multilayer interfaces on the studied coatings is similar with the same number of layers, the MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>H</span></sub> layer has more impact on the hardness of the MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>L</span></sub>/MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>H</span></sub> multilayered coatings, whereas the MoS<sub><span>2</span></sub>–Ti<sub><span>L</span></sub> layer substantially affects the friction and wear resistance.</p>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
4