Figure 2 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships hypothesized for the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section using nuclear (nu) and/or mitochondrial (mt) genes; A, species tree inferred using mt and nu genes by Breitman et al. (2011a); posterior probability (Pp) values higher than 0.5 are shown, bold branches show clades with Pp> 0.95; B, Bayesian tree, representing concatenated analyses and summarizing information from maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods from Breitman et al. (2011a); nodes with high support from three methods (MP jack-knife and ML bootstrap> 0.70; Pp> 0.95) are identified by bold branches; open squares show nodes with weak MP support, and circles nodes with weak MP and ML support; C, ML tree recovered using mt genes by Schulte & Moreno-Roark (2010).
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0