Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Figure 7 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees obtained after new analyses were performed. They are based on a compilation of data sets and three scorings by different authors. Out-groups are indicated in grey. The shared part, not shared previously, is shaded in grey. A, strict consensus tree of the four most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 1078 steps). The matrix includes 469 characters. B, strict consensus tree of the six most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 1118 steps). The matrix includes 450 characters. C, strict consensus tree of the three most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 996 steps). The matrix includes 450 characters.

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
12
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics