Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Figure 5 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 5. Strict consensus trees (except for Yates et al., 2010) found after a reduction of the taxonomic scope (21 ingroups). Out-groups are not represented. A, strict consensus tree of the 252 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 680 steps). B, most-parsimonious tree obtained running the data set from Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 896 steps). C, strict consensus tree of the 88 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 546 steps). D, strict consensus of the trees A, B, and C. Branches in grey indicate areas in common among the three analyses.

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
12
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics