Figure 5 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships
Figure 5. Strict consensus trees (except for Yates et al., 2010) found after a reduction of the taxonomic scope (21 ingroups). Out-groups are not represented. A, strict consensus tree of the 252 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 680 steps). B, most-parsimonious tree obtained running the data set from Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 896 steps). C, strict consensus tree of the 88 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 546 steps). D, strict consensus of the trees A, B, and C. Branches in grey indicate areas in common among the three analyses.
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0