Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Figure 6 in Biased heteroplasmy within the mitogenomic sequences of Gigantometra gigas revealed by sanger and high-throughput methods

Figure 6. Two examples of the heteroplasmic sites in Sanger sequencing which correspond to the differently sequenced sites. Panels A and B indicate the sites at which the second-peak is obviously higher than the third-peak and fourth-peak, and the base state of the second-peak can be obtained by at least one result of HTS. The different fluorescence densities of base situated at np 1923 in the cox1 are shown in the panel A, and the panel B shows the nucleotides with amino acids at np 1923 in the results of Sanger and HTS methods. The nucleotides are C in the results of HTS sequencing, while the corresponding nucleotides are T in the results of Sanger method in both positions, and the different nucleotides lead not to the amino acids changed. Panels C and D indicate the site at the unobvious second-peak, which is slightly higher than the third-peak and fourth-peak, and the base state of the second-peak can also be obtained by at least one result of HTS. Panel C shows the unobvious second-peak at np 7125, and the nucleotide and amino acid of the site in the results of Sanger and HTS methods are shown in panel D. The amino acids are listed using single-letter amino acid abbreviations.

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics