Figure 2 in On the evolution and diversification of an Andean clade of reptiles: combining morphology and DNA sequences of the palluma group (Liolaemidae: Phymaturus)
Figure 2. The total-evidence consensus tree. Red nodes, numbered 1–6, are those found in previous studies (see Fig. 1): node 1, vociferator clade (vociferator group of Morando et al., 2013); node 2, bibronii clade (present study); node 3, verdugo lineage (clade F of Lobo et al., 2012a; verdugo group of Morando et al., 2013); node 4, mallimaccii subclade (clade G of Lobo et al., 2012a; mallimacci group of Morando et al., 2013); node 5, antofagastensis lineage (clade H of Lobo et al., 2012a); node 6, punae lineage (clade I of Lobo et al., 2012a); node 7, roigorum subclade (roigorum group of Morando et al., 2013), but including the verdugo lineage (node 3). Values below branches are jackknife percentages. Phymaturus illustrating the tree, from top to the bottom: males of Phymaturus damasense, Phymaturus roigorum, Phymaturus verdugo, and Phymaturus williamsi. For more details, see the main text.
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0