Figure 2. A, Tree resulting from maximum likelihood analysis from the 12S in A molecular perspective on the evolutionary affinities of an enigmatic neotropical frog, Allophryne ruthveni

Figure 2. A, Tree resulting from maximum likelihood analysis from the 12S data set using the Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano two parameter model (Hasegawa et al., 1985). Included for comparative purposes are bootstrap support from NJ analyses. Below each resolved branch are indicated percentage bootstrap support in excess of 50% for: ML (100 pseudoreplicates), NJ (1000 pseudoreplicates; Kimura 2-parameter), NJ (1000 pseudoreplicates; Tamura–Nei). B, Strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees (all substitutions weighted equally; tree length = 164 steps). Below each branch are indicated percentage bootstrap support (1000 pseudreplicates) in excess of 50% for: MP (unweighted), MP (stems weighted twice loops), MP (transversions weighted four times transitions). Bremer decay indices (DI) are the final value shown below each resolved branch (for MP unweighted only). A dash indicates bootstrap support of less than 50%.