Anomaly Detection and Machine Learning
<p>The datasets were preprocessed. Correlated features were removed.</p> <p>Related papers:</p> <p><strong>[1]</strong> Iman Sharafaldin, Arash Habibi Lashkari, and Ali A. Ghorbani, “Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization”, 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), Portugal, January 2018</p> <p><strong>[2]</strong> Nour Moustafa, October 16, 2019, "UNSW_NB15 dataset", IEEE Dataport, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8vf7-s525.</p> <p><strong>[3]</strong> “Sebastian Garcia, Agustin Parmisano, & Maria Jose Erquiaga. (2020). IoT-23: A labeled dataset with malicious and benign IoT network traffic (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4743746”</p> <p><strong>[4]</strong> A. D. Kent, “Comprehensive, Multi-Source Cybersecurity Events,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, http://dx.doi.org/10.17021/1179829, 2015.</p> <p> </p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0